assessed

TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network 11882

TRAINYOUCAN is an accredited training provider through the ETDP SETA that manage all its bookings through the booking site www.coursesdirect.co.za. TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network Those who have achieved this unit standard will be able to moderate assessments in terms of the relevant outcome statements and quality assurance requirements. The candidate-moderator will be able to use the prescribed Quality Assurance procedures in a fair, valid, reliable and practicable manner that is free of all bias and discrimination, paying particular attention to the three groups targeted for redress: race, gender and disability. TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network ETDP, SETA, Accredited, Training provider, durban venue hire, trainer, assessor, moderator, sdf TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network TRAINYOUCAN Accredited Training Network is a Private Higher Education Institution registered with the DHET (Department of Higher Education and Training) and accredited through the ETDP SETA with level 4 BEE status. TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network We provides both NQF accredited courses and customised learning solutions to organisations and individuals, looking to maximise their investment in developing themselves. Leaders in courses such as Train the Trainer also known as Facilitator, Assessor, Moderator and SDF Training Courses or Skills Development Facilitator Training, Project Management and Disciplinary Hearing courses. TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network Our Members Forum consist of over 17800 discussions, templates, model answers and incentive course discounts for every single course offered by our network. That’s right! We have free resources and discussions on every single course offered to members who attended a course with us with life-time access and support. TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network TRAINYOUCAN SETA Accredited Training Network

How are learnerships assessed

An assessment system that is appropriate and serves the objectives of the new learnership system has to be put into place. This assessment system should serve to promote quality into a learning and training as well as to give awards for achieved competencies.

It is recommended that a new system be based on the following guidelines:

      *In the assessment process, language requirement must encourage the development and use of languages previously discriminated against.

 

      *The procedures of the criteria for assessing learner performance should be laid before the assessment takes place.

 

      *Assessment in a learnership must, as far as possible, be integrative and not only emphasis practical skills.

 

      *A wide range of evidence should be promoted in an assessment. Portfolio-based assessment should be privileged for moderation as this form of assessment makes auditing less costly and the evidence can travel.

 

      *The occurrence of external or final test assessment may not be the norm for all kinds of learnerships. *Generally, “high-risk” learning should be subjected to this final assessment.

 

      *The quality assurance procedures should be developed in consultation of all relevant parties to establish fairness, efficiency and effectiveness.

 

      *The determination of learning progress should take place primarily where the learning is taking place. The assessor should be registered as competent with an education and training quality assuror/sector education and training organisation. The assessor may be the learning facilitator or instructor.

 

    *Available qualified and competent assessors are as important as competent trainers.